Jan06

NBL basketball had been nut-punched by its broadcasting deal with Channel 10 for what felt like forever, so when NBL.tv came along all Aussie hoops fans rejoiced. The opportunity to watch nearly every game live and uninterrupted at an affordable price is something that should not be taken for granted and for the most part, has NBL fans feeling extremely appreciative…

…Hoop Diary included.

There are some teething issues with the coverage, which is to be expected with such a new product but there are also some really simple (cost free) adjustments that can be made to improve the overall experience for viewers.

When delivering this ‘first of its kind’ product to the Australian sports public, it is absolutely imperative that it is easy on the eye. It does not need to be quite at the same level of the NBA’s equivalent right away but it does need to be clean. A simple, clean product that works well is always preferred over a shiny, gleaming, under-performing train-wreck.

The NBL.tv product as it stands right now leans way closer to column A than column B, so let’s start by listing some of the positives.

The starting line-ups listed before the game are extremely clean and easy to read. They do not feature the ludicrous spinning shoes that Channel 10 seem to be okay with and they present all the required info in an easy to read format.

This looks fine, much better than spinning shoes on Channel 10.

The streaming quality for the most part is excellent. Varying reports have surfaced on social media platforms regarding this subject but my guess is that individuals’ Internet bandwidth and line contention play a large part in streaming quality for most households and mobile devices. Having had professional experience in this field, I can confidently tell you that this is unavoidable.

The commentary teams overall are really good. Most of the commentary I’ve heard this season has featured plenty of stats, notes and trivia that keeps the audience interested. There are a small number of commentators that really don’t know what they’re saying/doing but let’s face it, the same could be said for AFL coverage at times.

Finally, the integration of social media with this product has been excellent in my opinion. Very rarely have we seen any mind-numbing tweets from the NBL.tv account, which always delivers reminders and prompts users to log on and enjoy the games.

Now for the immediate fixes, which for the record won’t cost the earth (in most cases nothing at all) and will provide an instant and significant improvement to the overall customer experience.

Firstly, I would not go live with audio or video (mainly audio) until the game is being officially introduced by the host. Often the commentators can be heard sound testing and speaking with production crews which isn’t in any way offensive but it certainly looks amateur. Keeping the “live telecast to begin shortly” graphic displayed longer would be a good start.

Secondly, if the video player could somehow save a user’s display settings this would make life a lot easier. Even when switching between games, the default bandwidth setting is so low that the court and players are practically unrecognisable. Once the user has set their chosen speed, it would be great if that info was somehow saved to their profile.

Finally, and this is a big concern to many of the NBL’s paying customers but the choice of camera angles and timing of replays during games needs a major overhaul.

Trying to follow the action from side to side on a baseline camera feed? No thanks, you’ve giving me a headache.

Frantically changing camera angles during such a fast-paced sport is going to result in only one thing, missed action. Basketball’s main selling point is the fast and athletic end-to-end action and if these plays are being missed because a producer has an itchy trigger finger, then someone needs to take charge and put a stop to it.

The use of the baseline camera angle should only be used on free throws, replays, dead ball situations and occasionally when a player has just scored and is running back on defense. It is a required angle as it breaks the monotony of staring at a singular feed and gives people an alternate view of the action. Utilising this camera angle when a team is swinging the ball around the perimeter on offense however is doing nothing for the viewer other than giving him/her a headache… or an epileptic seizure. Timing is also important with the changing of camera angles. Switching between camera angles a dozen times in 40 seconds is way, way too much.

As for the timing of replays, some telecasts are better than others but during a number of games, there seems to be a distinct detachment between producer and the game itself.

Example: The whistle blows and the camera zooms in on two referees discussing a call. The camera stays focused on these referees for approximately 30 seconds (of prime replay time) while they deliberate. Once they have decided on the call, the ball is in-bounded and the replay of the call in question begins. By the time the (sometimes extended) replay is finished, a live basket has just been scored and missed by the viewer.

Broadcasting a basketball game is relatively simple and it is important that the viewer can see as much of the court as possible while the ball is in play. If the crowd and commentators can be heard reacting to live on-court action while the viewer is stuck watching a replay, it is extremely frustrating and practically unforgivable.

Use the AFL once again as an example, this type of mistake wouldn’t happen very often and if it did, it would be a big deal. At the end of the day, a replay should NEVER cut off live action, period.

If the NBL want more and more people to sign up to online services such as NBL.tv in future then it needs to put its proverbial foot down. The league needs to iron out some non-negotiable standards that are to be followed and with these small but significant changes, we’ll have the best online package an Aussie sports fan could ask for.

Without them, it’s just another “she’ll be right mate” attempt at an initiative that could have been so much more.

Make the changes.

Pinterest
 

 

3 Responses to NBL TV – The Fix

  1. 137 days ago by koberulz

    Additionally: don’t give progress scores of games. I watched Wollongong-NZ first last night, figuring it’d be the better game and I could get to Sydney-Adelaide later, only to have the commentary team of the former spend inordinate amounts of time discussing the latter. I ended up muting it at half time just to avoid spoilers. Which, given that Brendan Joyce was on commentary, wasn’t that much of a loss (yet another no-cost thing they could have done: not hire him in the first place).

    This is the first time it’s happened all season, and Wollongong is also the worst offender as far as the camera angles go. Coincidence?


  2. 133 days ago by Luuuc

    I agree with all of those suggestions. The producers seem to want to “get value for money” from those baseline cameras at the expense of giving the viewer the best view at any given time. I can understand the temptation for them to press buttons when buttons are available, but they must always keep in mind that seeing every second of live action is essential. That applies to both providing a quality view (i.e. being able to see the ball and the positioning of players, with is rarely possible in general play from the baseline view) and not missing any important action – i.e. making quick decisions about replays. Unlike most other sports, which are slower and more predctable with their stoppages, missing 5 seconds in basketball can deprive the viewer of a quick score or spectacular play. Good play deserves to be replayed, but not if it means missing another good play.
    Good points, Paul. Fans have been pushing sensible changes like this for NBL.TV all season. I really hope they take some notice and make these tweaks eventually. They’ve got a good product, but a lack of feel for the game is leaving it just short of where it could and should be.


  3. 126 days ago by Nate Jones

    Another piece of feedback that I would like to give is regarding the replays. Anyone watching a replay just wants to see a 5-10 second intro then the tipoff. Fast forwarding through 25 minutes of pre game interviews/lay up drills, sound checks isn’t fun.


 
 
 

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>